Legal Opinion

Goldsmith v. Salkey

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 10, 1937No. 10176PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Chief Justice.

Appellant Ruth E. Goldsmith and appel-lee, J. Sydney Salkey, were married in St. Louis, Mo., on June 18, 1924, and established the family domicile there. On February 26, 1926, a daughter, Joan, was born to the Salkeys, and, now eleven years old, still lives to be the subject of this litigation.

On July 15, 1930, in a proper circuit couit of the city of St. Louis, Mo., where the parties still resided, appellant, obtained a decree of divorce from appellee, with custody of the minor daughter for eleven months of the next year, and ten months of each ensuing year, until…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wilson v. ElliottTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Kenner v. KennerTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Krauthoff v. KrauthoffMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Lanning v. GregoryTexas Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Keith v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Helton v. CrawleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  2. Evans v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Oldham v. OldhamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Suter v. SuterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Best v. BestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API