Legal Opinion

Victoria v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 22, 1957No. 114, Docket 24252PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

On convincing evidence Judge Weinfeld has found that the injuries for which this merchant seaman seeks maintenance and cure were caused directly and solely by his drunkenness initiated on shore leave, and, holding it immaterial whether the actual injuries occurred on shore or on libelant’s return to his ship, has held an award barred under Barlow v. Pan Atlantic S.S.Corp., 2 Cir., 101 F.2d 697. We agree with *350this holding and with the judge’s careful analysis to conclude that other authorities cited to him had not weakened the authority of that case. We therefore affirm on his opinion,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barlow v. Pan Atlantic SS CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  2. Victoria v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Geraldo Lopez Victoria, Libelant-Appellant v. Luckenbach Steamship Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API