Legal Opinion

Toenniges v. Drake

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 15, 1884PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Erf or to County Court of Gunnison County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Beck, O. J.

The principal question submitted for adjudication in this case is whether, under our statute, a plaintiff can serve his own summons.

The record discloses that Drake, one of the plaintiffs below, was specially appointed by the sheriff of Gunnison county to serve the summons in this case, and that he did serve and return the same in manner specified in the Civil Code. ,

The provision referred to is as follows:

“ The summons shall be served by the sheriff of the county where the defendant is found, or by his deputy, or by a person specially appointed by him, or appointed by a judge of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Filkins v. O'SullivanIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Dyson v. BakerMississippi Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Montez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
  2. Nevada Cornell Silver Mines, Inc. v. HankinsNevada Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Daugherty v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  4. Bennett v. Colorado Department of RevenueColorado Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. Brettell v. DeffebachSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API