Legal Opinion
Schake v. Colt Industries Operating Corp. Severance Plan for Salaried Employees
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 2, 1992No. 91-3476PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ROSENN, Circuit Judge.
This action raises an interesting issue concerning the time limits the parties to a lawsuit have to file motions for prejudgment interest, costs, and attorney’s fees and the jurisdictional authority of the district court to act on such motions. After the entry of an amended summary judgment against Colt Industries Operating Corporation Severance Plan for Salaried, Nonunion Employees (the Plan) on October 11, 1990, counsel for the Plan participants filed a motion ninety-seven days thereafter, requesting the United States District Court for the Western…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Osterneck v. Ernst & WhinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Rode v. DellarcipreteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Holmes v. Pension Plan of Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Eleven Vehicles, Their Equipment and AccessoriesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Skretvedt v. E.I. DuPont De NemoursCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Anthuis v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Hahnemann University Hospital v. All Shore, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.