Legal Opinion
Oregon Natural Desert Ass'n. v. McDaniel
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided January 14, 2011No. CV 09-369-PKPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PAPAK, United States Magistrate Judge:
Plaintiff Oregon Natural Desert Association (ONDA) brings this action arising from the travel management planning process for the Steens Mountain. ONDA names as defendants the United States Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”), Kenny McDaniel, District Manager for the Burns District of BLM, and Joan Suther, Field Manager for the Andrews Resource Area of the Burns District of BLM, 1 Specifically, ONDA alleges that BLM’s adoption of the Travel Management Plan violates the Steens Mountain Cooperative Management and Protection Act of 2000…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. AzarDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- WildEarth Guardians v. JeffriesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019
- Western Watersheds Project v. Bureau of Land ManagementDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
- League of Wilderness Defenders/Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
- United States v. Western Radio Services Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2012