Legal Opinion

Weinstein v. Rodger Corp.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 5, 1952No. 1236PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge.

Appellant, as tenant, brought suit to recover damages for rental overcharges ’as provided by D.C.Code 1940, Supp. VII, 45-1610. Appellees, as landlords, defended on the ground that the premises were used for a commercial purpose and therefore not sub j ect to rent control. There was a finding and judgment for the appellees, from which appellant 'brings this appeal.

Appellees, Rodger Corp., Meyer Revitz, Ada Revitz, and the G. M. P. Corp., were allowed to bring in Simon Gerber and Judith Gerber as third-party defendants on the ground that the latter, by virtue of a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bellmore v. BaumDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. White v. AllanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Woodruff v. Loving Motors, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Morfessis v. ThomasDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Hohensee v. ManchesterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API