Legal Opinion

Hohensee v. Manchester

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 5, 1952No. 1238PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, 'Associate' Judge. •

This is an appeal by a tenant from a judgment for possession in favor of his landlord. The basis of the suit was a notice to quit, it being alleged that the rented premises were not used as housing accommodations but were used for commercial purposes. If this were true, the premises were hot subject to the District of Columbia Emergency Rent Act.1 The defense, however, was that the premises were used as housing accommodations and therefore subject to the rent act. The very brief record on appeal2 discloses that the premises, described as the entire top floor of a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bellmore v. BaumDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Bonanno v. BolloSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1946
  3. White v. AllanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. Ridolfi v. BentonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Woods v. GrafDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kelley v. HinnantDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API