Legal Opinion
Green v. Mattingly
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 21, 2009No. Docket 08-4636-cvPublishedCited by 166 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-appellant Sharice Green (“plaintiff’ or “Green”) brought this action on behalf of herself and her child claiming that defendants-appellees violated the United States Constitution and New York law when they successfully petitioned the Family Court of the State of New York (“Family Court”) for an order temporarily removing plaintiffs child from her custody. The District Court dismissed the bulk of plaintiffs claims under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine on the ground that they complained of injuries caused by a state-court judgment.
We are once against…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by166 opinions
- Cho Ex Rel. Situated v. City of N.Y.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- McKnight v. MiddletonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Hunter v. McMahonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
- Kevin Harold v. Christopher SteelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- V.S. Ex Rel. T.S. v. MuhammadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
161 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.