Legal Opinion

Helfferich v. Farley

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided July 24, 1980No. File 20567PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John F. Shea, Jr., J.

The defendants have moved for an order authorizing them to take the depositions of each of the two plaintiffs without the presence of the other plaintiff. The defendants have cited as reasons for the motion the claims that the credibility of the plaintiffs is an essential issue and that separate depositions would prevent one plaintiff from shaping his answers to corroborate the testimony of the other. The plaintiffs have objected to this motion on the basis that both plaintiffs are parties to the action and therefore have a right to be present during the taking of any…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. TiceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Anderson v. SnyderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
  3. Kopplin v. KopplinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1946

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Richardson-Merrell, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1985
  2. Onaka v. OnakaHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Hamon Contractors, Inc. v. District Court of the First Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  4. Hines v. WilkinsonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1995
  5. Ryfeul v. RyfeulAlaska Supreme Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API