Legal Opinion

Gonzales v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 19, 1983No. A14-82-322CRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DRAUGHN, Justice.

This appeal follows conviction on a plea of nolo contendere for the offense of possession of methadone, a controlled substance. Punishment was ten years imprisonment. Appellant raises three grounds of error. The first two allege that there was insufficient evidence to prove either that the substance seized was methadone, or that the appellant actually possessed it. We are jurisdictionally precluded from considering these insufficiency of evidence points because they were not properly preserved for appeal in accordance with TEX. CODE CRIM.PROC.ANN. art. 44.02 (Vernon…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Galitz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Ebarb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sutton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Durwin Young v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2018
  3. Carter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. Gonzales v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  5. State v. McAdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API