Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. McAdams

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 24, 1991No. 89-423Published

1Concurrence

BATCHELDER and JOHNSON, JJ.,

concurring specially: We would adopt a plain error standard to address claims of insufficient evidence raised for the first time on appeal, and therefore we concur in the result only.

New Hampshire is one of only thirteen jurisdictions that have not yet adopted some form of the plain error rule, which allows an appel*450late court to reverse a decision for “plain error” or “manifest injustice,” even where the error was not brought to the attention of the trial court. See Gerbige v. State, 571 So. 2d 401, 401 (Ala. Crim. App. 1990); Aaron v. State, 300 Ark. 13, 14-15,…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Commonwealth v. ClairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Wiborg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API