State v. William Jack Bias
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KIDWELL, Judge Pro Tem.
William Jack Bias was convicted of driving while under the influence of alcohol. After he was sentenced, he filed several motions, including a motion for substitute counsel and an Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion, seeking leniency regarding, his sentence. His motions were denied and Bias appealed. He argues that the court erred by denying his motion for substitute counsel and proceeding to decide his other motions. He also argues that the district court failed to adequately consider mitigating factors at sentencing.
I
BACKGROUND
Bias was charged with driving while under the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. SeversonIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
- Charboneau v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. JakoskiIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. DoserIdaho Court of Appeals · 2021
- State v. DoserIdaho Court of Appeals · 2021