Legal Opinion

Preferred Tires, Inc. v. Village of Hempstead

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHooley, J.

This is an action brought to restrain the village of Hempstead from enforcing the provisions of a village ordinance which was enacted on or about the 21st day of February, 1939, and which, by the terms thereof, becomes effective on April 1, 1940.

The ordinance relates to all kinds of signs and in effect prohibits any and all types of vertical signs and any other signs projecting from the face of any building over any sidewalk, street, highway or alley in the village and requires the removal of all signs presently in existence which are violative of the provisions of said section.

The plaintiff…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. . RingeNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. People Ex Rel. M. Wineburgh Advertising Co. v. MurphyNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Duryee v. . Mayor, Etc., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. People v. KucNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. City of St. Louis v. St. Louis Theatre Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. GoodmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Ver Hoven Woodward Chevrolet, Inc. v. DunkirkMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Oscar P. Gustafson Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Mallary, Inc. v. City of New RochelleNew York Supreme Court · 1944
  5. People v. DiamondLong Beach City Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API