Legal Opinion

Lincoln Joint Stock Land Bank v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation District

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1941No. 31055PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

This is an action to recover for damages sustained to growing crops as a result of seepage alleged to have been caused by water from the defendant’s supply canal. Plaintiff recovered a judgment for $598.82, and defendant appeals.

Plaintiff was the owner, during the times herein mentioned, of two tracts of land lying south of the North Platte river in Keith county. For convenience, the east tract will be referred to as the Lute land and the west tract as the Snyder land. The lands alleged to have been seeped by defendant’s supply canal are approximately one-half mile south of the North Platte…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pfister & Vogel Leather Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Enders v. Sinclair Refining Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Joldersma v. Muskegon Development Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Wynn v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Faught v. Dawson County Irrigation Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Webb v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Western Land Roller Co. v. SchumacherNebraska Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API