Legal Opinion

Western Land Roller Co. v. Schumacher

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1949No. 32561PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

This is a suit to foreclose a mechanic’s lien for the balance due on two contracts for the drilling of two irrigation wells. The defendants alleged that the first well was not in accordance with the agreement and deny liability therefor. They also allege that the second well was not constructed within the time specified and they counterclaim for damages resulting to growing crops because of said breach. The trial court found that there was nothing due plaintiff for drilling the first well, found that there was $1,654.95 due for drilling the second well, and dismissed the counterclaim for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Snyder v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Beskas v. CalkinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Reetz v. OlsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Lincoln Joint Stock Land Bank v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Rhodes v. Cleveland Rolling-Mill Co.United States Circuit Court · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Siefford v. Housing Auth. of City of HumboldtNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Olson v. PedersenNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Snyder v. LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Omaha Public Power District v. Darin & Armstrong, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Superior Combustion Industries, Inc., a Corporation v. Schollman Bros. Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API