Legal Opinion

In re Lichtenstein

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1996PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Gerald V. Esposito, J.

Margaret Ann Bomba, Esq., the court evaluator appointed by this court by order dated September 12, 1996, in the above-entitled proceeding, has moved by order to show cause, for an order to: disqualify Jonathan Bachrach, Esq., attorney for the petitioner, Hanna Lichtenstein, on the grounds that he (Bachrach), by reason of his former representation of the alleged incapacitated person (AIP) (Edda Wogelt), his fiduciary representation of her, and his present representation of the petitioner, is rendered in conflict of interest with the AIP, Edda Wogelt;…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cardinale v. GolinelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Greene v. GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Solow v. W. R. Grace & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. People v. ShinkleNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. In re KarpAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of HarrisNew York Surrogate's Court · 2008
  2. 55th Management Corp. v. GoldmanNew York Supreme Court · 2003
  3. AZZI, MICHELE M., MTR. OFAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  4. Crump v. LyonsNew York Supreme Court · 1997
  5. In re AzziAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API