Legal Opinion

Saint Marys Machine Co. v. Cook

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 20, 1920PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Breckinridge Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

*113Opinion op the Court by

Judge Thomas

Reversing.

Appellee and plaintiff below, John Cook, was engaged in the grist milling business at Irvington, Kentucky, operating under the name of Irvington Mill & Elevator, and on May 28, 1915, he claims to have entered into a contract with appellant and defendant below, Saint Marys Machine Company, to purchase from it one “forty-brake horse power oil engine of the H. 0. type Saint Marys, to operate on fuel oil as fuel, two-cylinder, single acting, four-stroke cycle.” There was a clause in the contract saying: “The engine is guaranteed to operate…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Louisville, Henderson & St. Louis Railway Co. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  2. Glover Machine Works v. Cooke-Jellico Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  3. Interstate Coal Co. v. DeatonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  4. Chicago, St. Louis & New Orleans Railroad v. HooverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  5. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. Carson-Muse Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Prudential Ins. Company of America v. SissonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  2. Greene v. HydenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API