Seeling v. Seeling

JANVIER, Judge.

This matter comes before us on motion to dismiss the appeal.

Originally when the motion was filed in the Supreme Court there were two grounds on which the dismissal was sought; first, that the Supreme Court lacked jurisdiction since the amount in dispute — there being no amount' — did not exceed $2,000. This contention, if it originally had merit, is now moot since the transfer of the case to this Court by the Supreme Court has become effective as a result of the constitutional amendment, Act 593 of I960.'

The second ground on which the dismissal of the suspensive appeal is…