Legal Opinion
Knopf v. Phillips
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 25, 2020No. 18-661Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
18-661 Knopf v. Phillips UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION ASUMMARY ORDER@). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. At…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Lama Holding Co. v. Smith Barney Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- In Re: Sharp International Corp. & Sharp Sales Corp., Debtors. Sharp International Corp., Debtor-Appellant v. State Street Bank and Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.