Lee Ah Yin v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
On April 26, 1901, the plaintiff in error, a Chinese woman, was arrested and brought before a United States commissioner on the charge of being a Chinese manual laborer, within the limits of the Northern district of California, without the certificate of residence required by the act of congress approved May 5, 1892, entitled “An act to prohibit the coming of Chinese persons into the United States,” and the act of November 3, 1893, amendatory thereof. The commissioner, upon the evidence taken, found and adjudged that the plaintiff in error is a subject of the Chinese…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lee Sing Far v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
- Gee Fook Sing v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1892
- Case of the Chinese MerchantUnited States Circuit Court · 1882
- United States v. Ah FawnDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1893
- United States v. DouglasU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1883
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lee Yuen Sue v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1906
- Lew Quen Wo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1911
- Ex parte Ng Quong MingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1905
- Moy Guey Lum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1914
- United States v. Hom LimDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1914
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.