Legal Opinion
State v. Kelly
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 15, 1995No. 14537PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Brogan, Judge.
The state of Ohio appeals from the judgment of the trial court which dismissed the indictment against Ricardo Kelly because the state failed to provide Kelly a speedy trial.
On November 2,1992 Ricardo Kelly was charged by indictment with one count of aggravated trafficking in violation of R.C. 2925.03(A)(1) for allegedly selling crack cocaine to an undercover Dayton Police officer on June 10, 1992. He was arrested on the indictment on February 4, 1994. Counsel moved to dismiss the indictment, alleging speedy trial violations, and the trial court sustained Kelly’s motion after an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Howard Ross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. KrausOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Miamisburg v. RinderleOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. EcholsOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. DixonLucas County Court of Common Pleas · 1996