Legal Opinion
Kardwheel Corp. v. Karper
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 4, 1956PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
In this action, brought by a corporation for reformation of a contract, the defendant Karper moves to set aside the service of the summons and complaint and to strike out the appearance of the attorneys for the plaintiff on the ground that the suit is unauthorized by the plaintiff and that the plaintiff never retained the attorneys to sue.
Considerable immaterial data were presented; numerous irrelevant filed papers were referred to. The sufficiency of the complaint is not before me; the basic merits of the controversy between the parties are not here involved. After study, it is quite clear…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sterling Industries, Inc. v. Ball Bearing Pen Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sealand Investment Corp. v. Emprise Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1961
- Berma Management Corp. v. 140 W. 42nd St. Realty, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1960
- Schillinger & Albert, Inc. v. Myral Hats, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1967
- P. B. G. Realty, Inc. v. PutterNew York Supreme Court · 1963
- Gorbrook Associates, Inc. v. SilversteinNassau County District Court · 2013