Legal Opinion

Matter of Carey v. Morton

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 22, 1948PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConway, J.

There is presented for our. consideration and

construction the 1945 amendment to section 6 of article V of the New York State Constitution. We shall quote it presently. It will be helpful to our solution of the problem if we bear in mind certain relevant facts bearing upon it. There were constitutional amendments to section 6 of article V after World War I and World War II. They differed in certain respects but followed one general pattern. The first amendment was considered by us in Matter of Potts v. Kaplan (264 N. Y. 110). The second amendment is now before us. It is against that background…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Sherrill v. . O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Matter of Kuhn v. CurranNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Matter of Potts v. KaplanNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  4. Matter of Winternitz v. MortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1947

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Cash v. BatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Stefanik v. HochulNew York Court of Appeals · 2024
  3. Hutcheson v. Director of Civil ServiceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  4. Schuyler v. South Mall ConstructorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  5. Chamberlin v. Dade County Bd. of Public InstructionSupreme Court of Florida · 1962

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API