Legal Opinion
Lane v. Holderman
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided February 4, 1957PublishedCited by 102 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Wachenfeld, J.
Appellants, 43 employers in the laundry, dry cleaning and dyeing industry, petitioned the Appellate Division under B. B. 4:88-10 for a judgment declaring the provisions regulating overtime rates in Minimum Fair Wage Standards Mandatory Order No. 10, promulgated by the Commissioner of Labor and Industry under the Minimum Wage Act, invalid.
The order in question was issued on November 7, 1955 and governs the employment of women and minors in the affected industry. Pursuant to the recommendations of the wage board appointed by the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- American Power & Light Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Walling v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Walling v. Youngerman-Reynolds Hardwood Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- New Jersey State Chamber of Commerce v. New Jersey Election Law Enforcement CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Cammarata v. Essex County Park CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Sam Hargrove v. Sleepy's, LLC (072742)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
- D'Annunzio v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.