Legal Opinion
(PC) Dillingham v. Emerson
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 10, 2020No. 1:18-cv-00507Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JERRY DILLINGHAM, Case No. 1:18-cv-00507-AWI-SAB (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 12 FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE v. COURT’S APRIL 2, 2020 ORDER 13 N. EMERSON, et al., [ECF No. 73] 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff Jerry Dillingham is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 17 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 18 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration, filed on May 4, 2020. 19 Plaintiff seeks reconsideration under Federal Rule of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Signed Personal Check No. 730 of MesleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- R.E. Rodgers and Barbara Rodgers v. James G. Watt, Secretary of the Interior of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Kern-Tulare Water District v. City of BakersfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- SCHROEDER v. McDONALDCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Kirk Rishor v. Bob FergusonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.