Potenzo v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hoffman
The claimant, Thomas Potenzo, appeals from a judgment of the circuit court which confirmed a decision of the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission (Commission), denying his claim for benefits brought pursuant to the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) (820 ILCS 305/1 et seq. (West 1994)). For the reason that follows, we reverse the judgment of the circuit court and remand this cause to the Commission for further proceedings.
The facts of this case are not in dispute. The claimant has been employed by Jewel Food Stores (Jewel) as a truck driver since 1991. On February 27, 1995, the claimant…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- O'Dette v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
- Brady v. Louis Ruffolo & Sons Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
- Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- C. A. Dunham Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Metropolitan Water Reclamation District v. Illinois Workers' Compensation CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- Venture-Newberg Perini, Stone & Webster v. Illinois Workers' Compensation CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 2014
- Milynarczyk v. Illinois Workers' Compensation CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- Young v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Comm'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- Adcock v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Comm'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.