Legal Opinion

Pane v. Un. Comp. Bd. of Rev.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 6, 1986No. Appeals, 2122 C.D. 1984 and 2539 C.D. 1984PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Doyle,

This is an appeal by Anthony S. Pane (Claimant) 1 from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) affirming a referee’s determination that a special initial payment' Claimant received pursuant to his employer’s retirement policy is subject to the pension offset provision of Section 404 (d) (iii) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 2 43 P.S. §804(d)(iii).

The facts are not in dispute. Claimant was employed by Wyckoff Steel Division, Ampco-Pittsburgh Company (Employer) for forty-three years as a security guard. Claimant’s last day of work was on or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States Steel Corp. v. Commonwealth of Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Poola v. UNEMP. COMP. BD. OF REVIEWSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Placek v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. McMahon v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API