Legal Opinion

McMahon v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 28, 1986No. Appeal, No. 2818 C. D. 1984PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Palladino,

This is an appeal by Patrick J. McMahon (Claimant) and similarly situated employees of Mesta Machine Company (Mesta)1 from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) affirming a referees decision which held that a special initial payment made to Mesta employees pursuant to the provisions of the Mesta Employee Retirement Plan must offset unemployment compensation benefits pursuant to Section 404(d)(iii) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law).2 We affirm in part and reverse in part.

*482Claimant was last employed by Mesta on May 27, 1983. In…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Latella v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Pane v. Un. Comp. Bd. of Rev.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Placek v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API