Legal Opinion

Boy v. I.T.T. Grinnell Corp.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 15, 1986No. 1 CA-CIV 7353PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.

On November 10, 1980, the appellant, William Boy, filed suit against the appellee, I.T.T. Grinnell Corporation, (ITT), alleging that a pipe fitting produced by the defendant was unreasonably dangerous because it was improperly designed and defectively manufactured and that the fitting broke because of these defects, resulting in injury to the plaintiff. The jury found for ITT. On appeal, Boy argues there was error in the jury instructions and in the admission and exclusion of evidence.

The product involved is a cast iron pipe fitting—a 1 X ¾ inch concentric reducer used to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dart v. Wiebe Manufacturing, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Byrns v. Riddell, IncorporatedArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Christopher J. Reed, John Christopher Reed, Dorothy Reed v. Tiffin Motor Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  4. Jones v. Pak-Mor Manufacturing Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Brady v. Melody Homes ManufacturerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Platte-Clay Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. McJunkins v. Windham Power Lifts, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Anderson v. Nissei ASB MacH. Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  4. Lau v. Allied Wholesale, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Purvis v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API