Legal Opinion

Dixon v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 2010No. 1071564PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURDOCK, Justice.

Roger Dixon was convicted of attempted murder and of discharging a firearm into an occupied vehicle.1 Dixon filed a motion for a new trial alleging, among other things, (1) that several jurors failed to truthfully answer questions during voir dire, and (2) that the trial court improperly restricted Dixon’s cross-examination of a prosecution witness. Dixon’s motion for a new trial was denied after an evidentiary hearing. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed Dixon’s convictions and sentences by an unpublished memorandum, from which Judge Welch dissented, with an opinion.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Ex Parte BranchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. Freeman v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Albarran v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  2. McWhorter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  3. Marshall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2014
  4. Boudreaux v. PettawaySupreme Court of Alabama · 2012
  5. Dunaway v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API