Legal Opinion

Watson v. Watson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 25, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBhogdeN, J.

It was admitted by counsel in tbe trial of the case at bar that tbe plaintiffs are tbe owners of tbe lands in dispute unless “tbey bave been divested of said title by reason of a certain judgment in another action.” Tbe action referred to was instituted by tbe defendants in this suit, who are tbe children of tbe first marriage, against tbe children of tbe second marriage alleging that tbe deed made by the deceased J. M. Watson to tbe widow and children of tbe second marriage was secured by tbe exercise of dominating influence upon an old man by tbe second wife. A purported consent judgment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. . GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. Jennings v. . KeelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bobby Floars Toyota, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API