Legal Opinion

Bobby Floars Toyota, Inc. v. Smith

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 2, 1980No. 808DC167PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

The only question posed for review is whether defendant Charles Smith’s voluntary relinquishing the automobile ten months after attaining the age of majority constitutes a timely disaffirmance of his contract with plaintiff.

The rule in North Carolina regarding a minor’s contract liability is as follows:

It is well settled that the conventional contracts of an infant, except those for necessities and those authorized by statute, are voidable at the election of the infant and may be disaffirmed by the infant during minority or within a reasonable time after reaching majority.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. ChantosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Eubanks v. EubanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Baggett v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. Chandler v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. Fisher Ex Rel. Fisher v. Taylor Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Weaver v. Saint Joseph of the Pines, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  2. Creech Ex Rel. Creech v. MelnikCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Antonetti v. Activision Blizzard, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2025
  4. Gillespie v. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023
  5. Teague & Glover, P.A. v. Kane & Silverman, P.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API