Legal Opinion

Crescent City Motors, Ltd. v. Nalaielua

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1930No. 1943PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OE THE COURT BY

PERRY, C. J.

(Parsons, X, dissenting in part.)

This is a suit in equity, brought by a creditor to sub ject equitable assets of tlie debtor to the payment of a judgment. The parties filed before the trial court a statement of facts agreed upon by them. This showed that the complainant had duly recovered in a court of law having jurisdiction of the matter a judgment against the resyiondent Henry Nalaielua in the sum of $1361.50; that a writ of execution had been issued and returned unsatisfied; that the respondent has no property within the Territory of Hawaii which can be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Doe v. ConsidineSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  2. Lessee of Smith v. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
  3. Summet v. City Realty & Brokerage Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  4. Auld v. AndradeHawaii Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Grayson v. Tyler's adm'xCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Welsh v. Campbells.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Gordon C. York, Inc. v. Kragness (In Re Kragness)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1986
  3. In re the Trust Estate of HoltHawaii Supreme Court · 1957
  4. In Re Medeiros Testamentary Trust & Life Insurance TrustHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Matter of Trust Estate of KanoaHawaii Supreme Court · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API