Crescent City Motors, Ltd. v. Nalaielua
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OE THE COURT BY
PERRY, C. J.
(Parsons, X, dissenting in part.)
This is a suit in equity, brought by a creditor to sub ject equitable assets of tlie debtor to the payment of a judgment. The parties filed before the trial court a statement of facts agreed upon by them. This showed that the complainant had duly recovered in a court of law having jurisdiction of the matter a judgment against the resyiondent Henry Nalaielua in the sum of $1361.50; that a writ of execution had been issued and returned unsatisfied; that the respondent has no property within the Territory of Hawaii which can be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Doe v. ConsidineSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Lessee of Smith v. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
- Summet v. City Realty & Brokerage Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
- Auld v. AndradeHawaii Supreme Court · 1929
- Grayson v. Tyler's adm'xCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1882
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Welsh v. Campbells.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1955
- Gordon C. York, Inc. v. Kragness (In Re Kragness)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1986
- In re the Trust Estate of HoltHawaii Supreme Court · 1957
- In Re Medeiros Testamentary Trust & Life Insurance TrustHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
- Matter of Trust Estate of KanoaHawaii Supreme Court · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.