Legal Opinion

Welsh v. Campbells.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1955No. 2991PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

STAINBACK, J.

Plaintiff filed an action in assumpsit against the defendant, joining the trustees of the Estate of James Campbell as garnishees. The trustees filed their disclosure and moved for an order discharging them by reason of the spendthrift trust provisions of the will of James Campbell. The defendant filed no answer and an order of default was entered against her. On plaintiff’s motion the circuit court reserved to this court for determination the question raised by the motion of the trustees to discharge them by reason of the spendthrift trust.

There is no…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Nichols v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Broadway National Bank v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  3. Wetmore v. . WetmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Hyde v. WoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Jourolmon v. MassengillTennessee Supreme Court · 1887

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Coon v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Lembke v. UnkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Halberg v. YoungHawaii Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Chapman v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1961
  5. In Re the Estate of CampbellHawaii Supreme Court · 1963

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API