Legal Opinion

United States v. Borin

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 8, 1954No. 14534_1PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIVES, Circuit Judge.

This action arose from Defense Supplies Corporation’s administration of the Livestock Slaughter Subsidy Program, sometimes referred to as the “Meat Subsidy Program”, authorized by Section 2 (e) of the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, 56 Stat. 23, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 902(e). With the long range view of encouraging the production of livestock for slaughter, subsidy payments were made for the purpose of compensating slaughterers because of the low ceiling prices fixed by meat price regulations of the Office of Price Administration while the purchase prices for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. A. J. Phillips Co. v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Cherry Cotton Mills, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. United States v. SillimanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,949 J. William Wolf, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Robert R. Frank, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. United States v. Lennard L. MeadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  3. Galvan v. MillerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Blusal Meats, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  5. W. Kelly Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API