Legal Opinion
Knoeffler v. Town of Mamakating
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 12, 2000No. 98 CIV. 6683 WCCPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. CONNER, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Paul Knoeffler moves for reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs against defendant Town of Mamakating (the “Town”) in the amount of $35,785.12 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988. On March 15, 2000, this Court granted in part plaintiffs summary judgment motion declaring that Chapter 44 of the Mamakating Town Code (the “Code”) and both the original and amended versions of § 199-45 of the Code were unconstitutional. See Knoeffler v. Town of Mamakating, 87 F.Supp.2d 322 (S.D.N.Y.2000). Plaintiff was also granted permission to seek damages…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Albert Farbotko v. Clinton County Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Farbotko v. Clinton CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Shannon v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- G.B. ex rel. N.B. v. Tuxedo Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Anderson v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.