Legal Opinion

City of Corsicana v. Herod

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided February 16, 1989No. 10-87-134-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMAS, Chief Justice.

The City of Corsicana, appellant, condemned the fee in a 3.1322-acre tract for the location of a “wet well” to pump water into its municipal water supply from the new Richland-Chambers Reservoir. To gain access to the pump site and as a right-of-way for its water pipelines, the city also condemned a 3.302-acre easement for a 4,800-foot long, 30-foot wide gravel roadway. The two parcels were contained in a 261-acre tract owned by appellees, S.F. and Gloria Herod, Eric and Joye Jones, Bill and Neva Haslbauer, and Barbara Woodward. The court entered a $2,316,314.50…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Gulf Land Co. v. Atlantic Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Bickler v. BicklerTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Davis v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. MeyerTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Vermillion v. HaynesTexas Supreme Court · 1948

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Busse v. Pacific Cattle Feeding Fund 1, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1995
  2. Steenbergen v. Ford Motor Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
  3. Gunville v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  4. McDonald v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. E.P. Operating Co. v. Sonora Exploration Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API