Legal Opinion
Dochelli v. Dochelli
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 5, 1939PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
This case went to judgment in January, 1938, and the defendant appealed. In May, 1938, the defendant made a motion for alimony pendente lite and this motion was granted in June. The plaintiff appealed from this action and the defendant’s motion to erase this appeal was heard at the October term and denied for the reasons stated in the memorandum thereon. Dochelli v. Dochelli, 125 Conn. 466, 3 Atl. (2d) 667. The plaintiff’s appeal from the granting of the motion for alimony was subsequently heard at the December term and was disallowed, the court saying: “It is to the interest of the state…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Employing Printers Club v. Doctor Blosser Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Mills v. MillsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Felton v. FeltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Maisch v. MaischSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
- Orsi v. OrsiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Willis v. WillisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
- Stecher v. StecherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Cosgrove v. CosgroveMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
- City of Derby v. DiYannoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Dervin v. DervinConnecticut Superior Court · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.