Legal Opinion
Dan's Supermarket v. Pate
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided November 2, 2001No. 00-226PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDEN, Justice.
[¶ 1] Appellants Dan's Supermarket (Employer) and the Wyoming Workers' Safety and Compensation Division (Division) challenge the payment of benefits to Appellee Constance K. Pate (Pate) for a 1996 work-related injury suffered while employed by Employer, contending that the hearing examiner improperly charged them with the burden of proving that Pate had suffered a new injury while working for another employer. Following a hearing, the hearing examiner ruled that Pate had suffered a continuation of pain symptoms from the 1996 injury, and the district court certified the case to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Corman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Aanenson v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- Union Pacific Railroad v. Wyoming State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- City of Casper v. UtechWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Pino v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Airtouch Communications, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Hall v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Mulford v. Walnut Hill Farm Group, LLCSupreme Court of Virginia · 2011
- Bailey v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- JB v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.