Legal Opinion

Lund v. Lund

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 2014No. 20130373PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEVERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Wendell Lund appeals from a memorandum opinion and order entered after a court trial dismissed his complaint for breach of an implied contract against his parents, Orville and Betty Lund. We conclude the district court’s memorandum opinion and order indicates the court intended its decision to be a final disposition of the lawsuit for purposes of treating this as an appeal from a final judgment. We also conclude the court did not err in determining there was no implied contract between Wendell Lund and his parents, and we affirm.

I

[¶ 2] In March 2011, this Court affirmed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Edward H. Schwartz Construction, Inc. v. DriessenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Lund v. LundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Lund v. LundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. In Re Estate of LutzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Jerry Harmon Motors, Inc. v. HethNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Northstar Founders, LLC v. Hayden Capital USA, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Valentina Williston, LLC v. Gadeco, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Estate of HarrisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Vig v. SwensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Funke v. Aggregate Construction, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API