Vig v. Swenson
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Tufte, Justice.
[¶ 1] Mary Ann Vig, as personal representative of the Estate of Junietta Swenson, appeals from an order1 dismissing the Estate’s action against Willis Swenson. The Estate argues that Junietta Swenson lacked capacity to execute a July 5, 2012, quit claim deed conveying her home in Noonan to her son, Willis Swen-son, and that he converted rent and grain proceeds when he subleased her farmland. We conclude the district court did not clearly err in finding Junietta Swenson was legally competent to execute the quit claim deed, or in finding that Willis Swen-son did not convert the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ritter, Laber & Associates, Inc. v. Koch Oil, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Fleck v. Jacques Seed Co., Prescott, WisconsinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Meyer v. RussellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
- Akerlind v. BuckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Buri v. RamseyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wald v. WaldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Hartman v. GragerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Ebel, et al. v. Engelhart, et al.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- Estate of FinstromNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Nelson v. NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.