Legal Opinion

Marren v. Ludlam

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 31, 2005PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*668In an action, inter alia, to recover on a promissory note, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Costello, J.), dated July 21, 2003, as granted the motion of the defendant William Ludlam for summary judgment dismissing the second cause of action and denied their cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the counterclaims of that defendant.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, the second cause of action is reinstated, the cross motion is granted,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Pesantez v. Boyle Environmental Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. DeLeon v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ramos v. SIMPLEXGRINNELL LPDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
  2. Johnson v. Carlo Lizza & Sons Paving, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  3. P & T Iron Works v. Talisman Contracting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Dragone v. Bob Bruno Excavating, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Aiola v. Malverne Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API