Legal Opinion
Parreco v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 6, 2005No. 03-AA-1488PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge:
Petitioner challenges the decision of the District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission (“RHC”) affirming a determination by an examiner of the Office of Adjudication of the Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs that invalidated petitioner’s rent increase for failure to give tenant the statutorily-required notice. The decision ordered a roll-back of the rent increase and imposed a fine of $1000 for an unlawful increase in rent. It also awarded the tenant reimbursement of two days’ rent for a period when tenant’s apartment had no heat, as well as a fine of $500…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gerard M. Monod and Alys Monod v. Futura, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Highlands, Inc., a Colorado Corporation, and Whipple Van Ness JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Moore v. MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Oubre v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Winchester Van Buren Tenants Ass'n v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Chaabi v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bernstein Management Corp. v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Dorchester House Associates Ltd. Partnership v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Wilson v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017