Legal Opinion
Malin International Ship Repair & Drydock, Inc. v. Modu Prospector
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided October 21, 2015No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-CV-0039PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION ON MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
GEORGE C. HANKS, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 110), the Objections filed by Malin International Ship Repair & Drydock, Inc. (“Malin”), and the Response by Maxim Crane Works, LP (“Maxim”).
In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court is required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the [magistrate judge’s] report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection [has been] made.” In…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- International Shortstop, Inc., and Sam Talkington v. Rally's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Ragas v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lightering LLC v. Teichman Grp., LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2018
- Howard v. Eckerd, Jr.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Texas · 2019