Legal Opinion

Upperline Equipment Co. v. J & M, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided December 18, 2009No. 2:08-cv-00260PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

THOMAS A. VARLAN, District Judge.

This civil action is before the Court on Defendant J & M Incorporated’s (“J & M’s”)Motion for Summary Judgment 1 [Doc. 21], in which J & M asserts that there is no genuine issue of material fact and the Complaint [Doc. 1-2] filed by plaintiffs Upperline Equipment Company, R & K Equipment Services, and North American Machinery, Inc. (referred to hereinafter as “Plaintiffs”) should be dismissed as a matter of law. Plaintiffs have filed a response in opposition [Doc. 23], and J & M has filed a reply [Doc. 26]. 2

The Court granted leave for…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Graham A. Peters v. The Lincoln Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  5. Burchett v. KieferCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Allen v. Middle Tennessee School of Anesthesia, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2022
  2. Monaco Industries, LLC v. Envoy Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2023
  3. Samantha Pack v. United Cleanup Oak Ridge, LLC; and RSI Entech, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2026
  4. TA Operating LLC v. Comdata, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2017
  5. Wirtgen America, Inc. v. Hayden-Murphy Equipment CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API