Upperline Equipment Co. v. J & M, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THOMAS A. VARLAN, District Judge.
This civil action is before the Court on Defendant J & M Incorporated’s (“J & M’s”)Motion for Summary Judgment 1 [Doc. 21], in which J & M asserts that there is no genuine issue of material fact and the Complaint [Doc. 1-2] filed by plaintiffs Upperline Equipment Company, R & K Equipment Services, and North American Machinery, Inc. (referred to hereinafter as “Plaintiffs”) should be dismissed as a matter of law. Plaintiffs have filed a response in opposition [Doc. 23], and J & M has filed a reply [Doc. 26]. 2
The Court granted leave for…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham A. Peters v. The Lincoln Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Burchett v. KieferCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Allen v. Middle Tennessee School of Anesthesia, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2022
- Monaco Industries, LLC v. Envoy Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2023
- Samantha Pack v. United Cleanup Oak Ridge, LLC; and RSI Entech, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2026
- TA Operating LLC v. Comdata, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2017
- Wirtgen America, Inc. v. Hayden-Murphy Equipment CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2024