Legal Opinion

Chislom v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 15, 1960No. [App. No. 35, September Term, 1960.]PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an application for leave to appeal from the order denying the applicant post conviction relief from his conviction for robbery. All of the contentions raised below were clearly without substance.

The claim of the petitioner that he had not been properly identified at the line-up of suspects was an irregularity in a preliminary investigative procedure which cannot be reviewed in a collateral proceeding. Rice v. Warden, 221 Md. 604, 156 A. 2d 632 (1959).

The contention that a co-defendant had stated that the petitioner was not one of the three robbers would raise a question of guilt or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barbee v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Rice v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  3. Brown v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Galloway v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. The People v. NovotnyIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. FranklinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
  3. Gans v. Warden of the Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  4. Brown v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  5. Roe v. DirectorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API