Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Villalonga
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided February 11, 1957PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Joseph A. Cox, S.
Testatrix, after a cash legacy to a great-niece and various specific bequests of jewelry to nieces and a granddaughter, divided the rest of her jewelry between two granddaughters who were at the date of the will her only *588grandchildren. She then gave her residuary estate in trust with income payable to her son during his life and upon his death to his wife and upon the death of both directed “ the principal to be paid over to any children surviving them, but in case no children survive him, or his wife, I will and direct that the said property be distributed between the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Scott v. . GuernseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Matter of Estate of BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- In Re the Accounting of MullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- In re the Accounting of KeoghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of MaguireAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Estate of BarnumNew York Surrogate's Court · 1967
- In re the Estate of McKimNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959
- In re the Accounting of Bank of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958