Legal Opinion

In Re the Accounting of Muller

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1929PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.

At the time of the execution of Magdalena Schaufele’s will, the testatrix was the mother of a daughter, Matilda, a son, William, and the grandmother of a boy and a girl, children of her deceased son Frederick. These four descendants survived her. The will directed the division of all real property into three equal parts. One part, or its proceeds, was given absolutely to the daughter. The two other parts, or their proceeds, were given to trustees, one for the benefit of the son and the other for the benefit of the grandchildren. The will further provided that, in the event of the death of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pimel v. . BetjemannNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Beebe v. . EstabrookNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of TruslowNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. In re the Accounting of KeoghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  5. In Re the Accounting of KeoghNew York Court of Appeals · 1908

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of WeilNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  2. In re Marine Midland Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. In re the Estate of HarrisNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
  4. In re the Estate of BogartNew York Surrogate's Court · 1970
  5. American Security & Trust Co. v. SullivanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1947

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API