Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of California v. Goss
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1DissentHutcheson, Circuit Judge
(dissenting)-
The majority opinion, with eminent fairness, accuracy and precision, sets out the record and poses the question to be decided. My difference with it is only in the *660conclusion it draws from the clearly stated facts.
My associates say “the item in controversy is the interest on said interest which never accrued but which existed merely as a debit under the loan agreement.”
This statement is, in my opinion, the source and the explanation of the error into which they have fallen. My inability to agree with this statement is certainly the source and explanation of my error, if I am…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bergholm v. Peoria Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Klein v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- McCampbell v. New York Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1923
- Willingham v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936