Legal Opinion
Club 99, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 30, 1982No. 82-119PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioner argues that (1) the District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board (the Board) lacks authority to discipline a licensee for violating statutes and regulations governing employment of minors; (2) if the Board has such power, an employer’s good faith compliance with these laws is an absolute defense; and (3) the Board failed to provide a fair hearing prior to a two-day suspension of its license. We affirm.
In November 1979, petitioner hired Natalie Jean Bryan, then sixteen years old, to work as a nude “Go-Go” dancer. During her employment interview, Bryan told petitioner’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Jonal Corporation v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Am-Chi Restaurant, Inc. v. Joy R. Simonson, Etc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Silverstone v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jones v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Park v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Maryland State Retirement & Pension Systems v. MartinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Jones v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987